Case Study: How Cuisines Tech Profab Prepares Its Succession by Transforming Its Management Positions
Contents
Preparing your succession is not just about choosing who will take over. It is about reorganizing the work of management so that what relies on one person can rest on many. Les Cuisines Tech Profab, a manufacturer of custom kitchen cabinets established in Repentigny since 1996, has set about it. In nine months, with the support of Progrès Conseils, the company has reframed its management positions, built a strategic plan, chosen its indicators and launched a continuous improvement process, by getting teams on board rather than imposing a plan on them.
Thirty years in the business and an efficient factory
Led by its president Lise Arsenault, Cuisines Tech Profab supplies distributors and kitchen designers in Quebec and Eastern Ontario. The company, which celebrates its 30th anniversary in 2026, invested early on in automated equipment and software that connects sales to the factory. Its fast delivery times are a direct result of this.
Lise Arsenault had also prepared an internal succession plan: integrating two partners into the management. There remained the two questions that make the difference between a plan and a successful transfer. How do you transfer your knowledge, know-how and some of your responsibilities in specific areas? And how do you change the new roles of the partners so that they also carry the company’s strategy and vision?
The click
The management team spent a good part of the week in operations and often dealing with emergencies. Four observations emerged.
- Overlapping roles : Some responsibilities were being carried out by several people at the same time.
- Limited resources : the three leaders wore many hats, and middle managers were few in number.
- Management absorbed by the operational side, which left less time for long-term planning.
- A succession to be prepared in anticipation of the transition of responsibilities to the two
| Before the accompaniment | After the accompaniment |
|---|---|
|
|
Nine months of work carried out with the management
Progrès Conseils began by listening, meeting the managers, understanding the company, its production constraints and the challenges specific to a transfer. The approach was then deployed gradually, with the people who would experience the changes, in three stages.
Clarifying who does what
The structure was changed in stages rather than in a single reorganization, to give the team time to absorb each change. Leadership positions were reframed first: responsibilities were redistributed to align everyone’s strengths with strategic directions, duplication of work was reduced, and each position was lightened of some of its operational aspects to incorporate a portion of strategy. A clear organizational structure defines roles and decision-making partitions. The issue seems simple, but it is a critical one, and it is this clarity that allows for a successful transfer of leadership.
Setting a course and benchmarks
Then came the strategic planning exercise spread over eight weeks of work, clear objectives, a concrete plan and defined tasks with their deadlines. One year after its adoption, the plan was reviewed and realigned with the reality of the company. This revision was used to measure the progress of the projects, to highlight the progress made, to draw the necessary conclusions and to set the objectives for year 2. A strategic plan that is reviewed regularly remains a real steering tool, at the service of the team and its ambitions.
The sessions were spaced two to three weeks apart, and we did each exercise together, one step at a time. The tipping point came with the decision matrices: each initiative proposed by the team was evaluated according to its impact and the effort it required. Projects that had been carried out for a long time went down the list, others moved up. From then on, the priorities were no longer based on an opinion, but on a ranking that the team had built itself.
Juliana A. Khalil, Founder, Progress Advice
Bringing continuous improvement to life and preparing the next generation
Two committees were created, one on production quality and the other on customer service, with specific objectives and their own indicators. Employees are now involved in the development of solutions, which anchors the approach in what creates value for the customer. Individual development plans then extended this approach, so that each team member could use their strengths and continue to learn and develop.
A management committee was added to regularly review the chosen indicators, the progress of the strategic plan and important decisions. The positions of the managers were then reviewed a second time, in order to better adapt them to the strengths of each leader and to ensure that everyone feels fully comfortable in their role. Thanks to distributed and documented management responsibilities, the succession can prepare with confidence and receive a more precise transfer, in line with the strengths of each individual and the company’s strategic directions.
What has changed
In nine months: two partners integrated into the management, three committees in operation, a strategic plan submitted to its year 2 and management positions reviewed twice. However, the most important change is not measured in percentage. The roles are clear, the committees are rotating, the teams know where the company is going and what they can grow there. The management, on the other hand, has recovered time to think about the next thirty years.
“His respectful approach and professionalism helped create a positive and collaborative work environment.”
Lise Arsenault, President, Les Cuisines Tech Profab
“What made the difference was the team’s openness to welcoming changes. The collaboration was a natural one: we listened, understood the issues, proposed several options, and then implemented the solutions together. »
Juliana A. Khalil, Founder, Progress Advice
What other leaders can take away from it
- Change in stages. A structure that evolves gradually gives people time to adjust, and this is what avoids resistance.
- Measure little, but well. A few clear indicators chosen for Year 1 make monitoring accessible to all, much more than a complex dashboard.
- Prepare the next generation by freeing up management. Managers who are less absorbed in the operational side find the time to think long-term.
And your company, where is it at?
Decisions that always go up to management, overlapping responsibilities, know-how that relies on one or two people, a succession to be prepared: these are often signs that a company is ready to take the next step. A first conversation is enough to see clearly. Discover our operational performance support for SMEs or discuss your situation with Juliana during a free 30-minute call.
Frequently asked questions
How do you transfer a leader’s knowledge to his or her successor?
The transfer is prepared in stages. First, the responsibilities of each person are clarified to know precisely what must be transmitted, then specific files are gradually entrusted to the next generation, with the manager remaining available as support. Committees and follow-up meetings serve as a learning ground, because the next generation makes real decisions before taking sole responsibility for them.
Why review a strategic plan after one year?
Because the company and its market are evolving. An annual review confirms priorities that still stand, abandon those that are no longer relevant, and adjust goals to the team’s actual capacity. This is what keeps the plan alive and useful on a daily basis.
How to prepare for the management succession in an SME?
Succession is prepared well before the transition. First, you need to distribute and document responsibilities so that the company doesn’t rely on a few people, and then develop the skills of those who will take over. Refocusing current leaders on strategy then facilitates the gradual transfer of decisions.